In another pointed jab in what’s becoming a surprisingly public media spat, actor-producer Mark Wahlberg has again taken aim at Today Show anchor Savannah Guthrie — this time mocking her speaking style in a way that’s equal parts sarcastic and cutting.
During an interview on a Boston-based radio show this week, Wahlberg was asked whether he had seen Guthrie’s recent response to his earlier criticisms. With a chuckle, he didn’t hold back.

“Yeah, I saw it. She definitely talks fast — I’ll give her that,” he said. “Honestly, watching her is like listening to a soccer announcer during overtime. Words flying, voice climbing, energy everywhere… and yet by the end, you don’t remember a single thing she said. You’re just exhausted — and reaching for the remote.”
The comparison sparked laughter in the studio, but online, it struck a more divisive chord. Some listeners cheered Wahlberg for his “refreshing honesty,” while others accused him of being dismissive, condescending, and unfairly critical of a respected journalist doing her job in real time, under constant pressure.
Wahlberg, who has previously criticized Guthrie’s presentation as “bland,” now seems to be shifting focus to what he sees as the opposite problem: over-delivery. In his view, the anchor’s high-speed, polished delivery may be technically impressive but ultimately overwhelming — and ineffective.
“There’s a difference between being informative and being intense,” Wahlberg continued. “People don’t tune in to be lectured at 90 miles per hour before they’ve even had breakfast. You gotta connect, not just perform.”
Savannah Guthrie, for her part, has not publicly responded to this latest comment. But sources close to the Today production team say she is “well aware” of the back-and-forth and finds it “more amusing than annoying.” One colleague noted: “She’s a lawyer, a journalist, and a mom. If Mark thinks a fast pace throws her off, he clearly doesn’t know who he’s dealing with.”

Still, Wahlberg’s comments highlight an ongoing tension between celebrity critique and journalism professionalism. While his remarks may be wrapped in sarcasm, they touch on a real debate: How much energy is too much in broadcast news?
Media experts weighed in, with some agreeing that the rapid-fire delivery common on morning shows can feel overwhelming in the age of constant stimulation. Others defended Guthrie’s style, arguing that clarity and speed are essential in live formats, where time is short and content is dense.
“Savannah Guthrie is trained to distill complex information in short timeframes,” said media analyst Nina Calder. “It’s not that she talks fast — it’s that she delivers efficiently. Some viewers want a calm voice over coffee. Others want energy. You can’t please everyone.”
Social media, as always, had mixed reactions. Some users joked that Wahlberg sounded like a “grumpy dad who couldn’t find the volume button,” while others admitted they’d often struggled to stay engaged during rapid-paced interviews.
Meanwhile, Wahlberg fans defended his critique, saying it comes from a place of authenticity. “Mark’s from Boston. He tells it like it is,” one fan tweeted. “If Savannah’s going a mile a minute, someone’s gotta say it.”

At the heart of this feud lies a broader question: Should morning news be calm and conversational, or quick and commanding? For Wahlberg, it seems the answer lies somewhere in between. His critique isn’t just personal — it’s reflective of how many viewers now consume information: selectively, cautiously, and often distractedly.
Whether Wahlberg’s latest remarks were constructive or just entertainment is up for debate. What’s clear is that he’s tapped into a wider audience sentiment about news fatigue — that relentless speed and endless updates can sometimes feel more draining than enlightening.
As the media landscape continues to evolve, so too will the expectations placed on those who deliver the news. And if this exchange between Wahlberg and Guthrie has taught us anything, it’s that even morning shows aren’t safe from primetime drama.